🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.